Annulment of the act
Judicial review of a final and enforceable decision alleged to be unlawful. Competence, form, reason, subject matter and purpose are examined.
A permit refusal, a disciplinary penalty and harm arising from a public service are not resolved by the same legal route. The nature of the act, the date of service, the competent authority and the result you want are the basis of the first review.
Judicial review of a final and enforceable decision alleged to be unlawful. Competence, form, reason, subject matter and purpose are examined.
A request to stay the application of the act while the case is pending. Manifest unlawfulness and harm that is difficult or impossible to remedy are assessed together.
Claims for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage arising from an administrative act or action. The conditions of prior application, liability and causation are determined.
INDIVIDUALS · COMPANIES · FOREIGN CLIENTS
We assess applications, lawsuits, interim protection and post-decision steps together, according to the needs of the file. The summaries below explain the scope of the relevant service and the basic distinctions.
Review of an unlawful act, capacity to sue, subject-matter and territorial jurisdiction; examination of concrete harm and grounds for urgent protection.
Review the guide : Annulment and stay of executionType of application, service records and the remaining time to file an action. Separate time-limit checks for the National Electronic Notification System (UETS), physical service and special procedures.
Review the guide : Applications and time-limit trackingHarm arising from a public service, an administrative act or an action; prior application, liability, evidence and heads of compensation.
Review the guide : Full remedy actions and compensationDetermining the legal route in decisions on permits and closure, sanctions, tenders and compensation for unjust occupation (ecrimisil), as well as in environmental matters and decisions of regulatory authorities.
Administrative Fines and Administrative SanctionsReview the guide : Permits and administrative sanctionsAppointment, discipline, personnel rights and security investigation; academic positions, examinations and student affairs.
Public Personnel and Civil Servant LawReview the guide : Public personnel and educationConditions for regional appeal (istinaf) and further appeal (temyiz), implementation of the decision and allegations of violation. Review of the 2026 amendments and transitional provisions.
Review the guide : Legal remedies and implementation of the decisionThe following are general rules. A special law, expedited proceedings, the type of act and the method of service may give rise to different or shorter time limits.
Unless a special time limit applies, the time limit for filing an action is 60 days before the Council of State (Danıştay) and the administrative courts, and 30 days before the tax courts. The starting date is determined according to the dispute.
Under Articles 10 and 11 of the Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 (İYUK), the general period of non-response is 30 days. In an Article 11 application, the days that passed beforehand are not lost; the remaining time to file an action is tracked.
Under Article 13 of İYUK, an application is generally made to the administration within 1 year of learning of the action and within 5 years of the action. Harm that arises later and the administrative nature of the matter are examined separately.
A notification that reaches the National Electronic Notification System is deemed to have been served at the end of the fifth day following its arrival. Failing to read it or to see the SMS does not postpone the time limit. The records of Registered Electronic Mail (KEP), UETS and physical service must be assessed separately.
Guide to applications, service of documents and time limitsBasis: Articles 7–13 of İYUK; Article 7/a of Law No. 7201 on Notification. To calculate the time limit, the decision and the service document must be examined together.
The decision, the notification, the institution, the earlier application and the urgent effect are identified.
Subject-matter and territorial jurisdiction, capacity, the application requirement and the required records are examined.
Within the agreed scope, the petition, the request for protection and the litigation steps are carried out.
The outcome of the decision, the available legal remedy, enforcement and additional requests are assessed.
The suitable route of application, missing documents, time-limited steps and the need for protection are identified. The attorney’s fee, as well as any court fees and expenses that may arise separately, are explained. The scope of representation becomes clear after acceptance of the matter and authorization; no commitment to a result is given.
Güneş & Güneş Law Firm, from its base in Antalya, assesses legal needs relating to administrative applications and cases throughout Türkiye. The competent authority, access to the file, on-site examination and the representation plan are determined separately for each dispute.
For the administrative acts in Türkiye of Turkish citizens living outside Türkiye and of foreign individuals and companies, online consultation, document preparation and the conditions of representation are assessed. The option of communication in Turkish, English, German and Russian does not replace the required official translation and certification procedures.
An annulment action aims at review of the lawfulness of an administrative act; a full remedy action aims at redress of a right violated by an administrative act or action. For compensation, the conditions of harm and liability must be shown separately.
As a rule, no. For the application of the act to stop, the conditions of a stay of execution and the relevant special provisions are examined. Statutory exceptions in tax disputes are assessed separately.
Not every objection stops the time limit. In an application that meets the conditions of Article 11 of İYUK, the remaining time runs after rejection or implied rejection; the days that passed before the application are counted.
Yes. Service is deemed to have taken place at the end of the fifth day following arrival at the UETS address. Waiting for the notification SMS or not opening the message does not postpone the time limit. The records of arrival and the evidence of service must be examined.
The special regulation on which the fine is based and the related acts are decisive. Not every administrative fine is taken to the administrative court; a distinction is made between the criminal judgeship of peace (sulh ceza hâkimliği) and administrative justice.
The court, the scope of the file, the expert examination and legal remedies affect the duration; a definite end date cannot be given. The attorney’s fee, court fees, expert and other expenses are explained after the consultation, according to the scope of service. If the conditions are met, legal aid is assessed separately.
An online preliminary consultation can be held for administrative acts in Türkiye. The company’s authority of representation, the power of attorney, and the need for translation and certification of foreign documents are assessed; service of documents and time-limit tracking are carried out separately.
Urban transformation, citizenship, deportation and international protection procedures are assessed separately under their own special application and time-limit rules.
Depending on the stage of the file and the request, the following provisions are assessed together.
This content is general information. Information and documents you share are kept confidential and used for legal assessment and within the agreed scope of service. An inquiry alone does not create an attorney–client relationship and does not stop time limits. The legal conditions of the specific matter are reviewed separately.