Skip to content
+90 531 883 33 88

ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATION · ANNULMENT · COMPENSATION

Annulment of Administrative Acts and Stay of Execution

Review of unlawful acts, standing, jurisdiction and competence; assessment of concrete harm and grounds for urgent protection.

Request a Consultation on Your Administrative Dispute

Actions for Annulment of Administrative Acts

An annulment action allows judicial review of the lawfulness of a final and enforceable act that the administration has taken by virtue of public authority. The act affecting the claimant’s interest is examined in terms of competence, form, reason, subject matter and purpose. The court does not take the administration’s place and issue a new act; it conducts a review of lawfulness.

In an annulment action, the following points are determined first:

  • Whether there is a final and enforceable act that can be brought before the court
  • Whether the claimant’s current and legitimate interest is affected by the act
  • The duty and competence of the authority that issued the act
  • Procedural requirements such as defense, obtaining opinions, composition of the board, reasons and service
  • The accuracy of the factual events and legal grounds on which the act is based
  • The consistency between the subject of the act and the result permitted by law
  • Whether there is any purpose other than the public interest and the requirements of the service
  • The limits of bound authority and discretionary authority
  • The principles of proportionality, equality, certainty, legal certainty and legitimate expectation
  • The time limit for filing suit, any special application route, jurisdiction and competence

Preparatory acts, opinions, records and internal correspondence of an institution may, as a rule, not be challenged on their own; however, they can matter when the reason and form elements of the final act are examined. In a petition, the legal effect and finality of the act should be the basis, not the name given to it.

Stay of Execution and Urgent Legal Protection

Because an administrative act may continue to be applied while the case is pending, a request for annulment alone may not provide sufficient protection in some files. The need for a stay of execution is assessed at the start of the file in cases such as closure of a business, annulment of a permit, termination of duty, demolition, suspension of an activity, a ban from tenders or other acts whose consequences are hard to reverse.

For a decision granting a stay of execution, manifest unlawfulness and harm that would be difficult or impossible to remedy if the act were applied must be shown together. The request is therefore substantiated not by general statements alone but on the basis of:

  • The grounds of manifest unlawfulness of the act
  • The concrete and imminent harm that application would cause
  • Whether the harm can later be remedied by compensation
  • How the activity, profession, education, property or public service is affected
  • Dated documents and records showing urgency
  • The public interest and the effects on third parties

The request is substantiated on these points. The objection route and time limit available against a decision of rejection or acceptance are followed separately, according to the nature of the decision.

Review the Act, Competence and Need for Protection Together

In an annulment action, the violation of interest, the final and enforceable act that can be challenged, the correct respondent and the competent and authorized court are determined. Not every letter is an act that can be challenged. The court does not take the administration’s place and issue an act; it conducts a review of lawfulness.

Two conditions are required together

For a stay of execution, it is substantiated together that the act is manifestly unlawful and that its application would cause harm that is difficult or impossible to remedy. The effect of the closure of a business, the loss of an academic term or removal from duty is made concrete with dates, records and documents. Acceptance of the request cannot be guaranteed.

Separate tax matters and special procedures

The general rule that filing suit does not automatically stop an act has statutory exceptions in tax disputes. In expedited proceedings and in procedures concerning central examinations, the application, time limit and objection arrangements are examined separately.

Preparing for the Consultation

Prepare the full decision, the service record and the delivery documents of earlier applications. State any approaching time limit at first contact.

Related Guides

Legal Basis

Depending on the stage of the file and the request, the following provisions are assessed together.

This content is general information. Information and documents you share are kept confidential and used for legal assessment and within the agreed scope of service. An inquiry alone does not create an attorney–client relationship and does not stop time limits. The legal conditions of the specific matter are reviewed separately.