Marine Environment, Oil Pollution and Environmental Liability
In marine pollution arising from oil, bunker fuel, chemicals or other harmful substances, emergency response, notification, cleanup costs, administrative sanctions, civil and criminal liability, insurance and compensation claims are addressed together. Law No. 5312, the Environment Law, MARPOL and the liability/compensation conventions that may apply are reviewed according to the type of the specific incident.
Samples, satellite and drone imagery, vessel records, waste delivery documents, incident site coordinates and cleanup invoices should be preserved with regard to their value as evidence. Payment of an administrative fine does not eliminate private-law compensation claims in every case.
The scope of Law No. 5312 does not apply automatically to every maritime incident; it is checked with respect to the vessel’s tonnage, the substance carried, coastal facility activity and the area of application. The time limits and conditions of an administrative application, an annulment action, private-law compensation and a criminal investigation are separate from one another.
Decarbonization and Emission Regulations in Shipping
The energy efficiency and greenhouse gas regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) may affect the vessel’s technical and operational obligations and the provisions on route, speed, performance and data sharing in the charter party. In voyages connected with European ports, where the scope conditions are met, the obligations under the European Union Emissions Trading System and FuelEU Maritime may also give rise to contractual cost and compliance issues for Turkish-flagged or Türkiye-based operators.
How the cost of emissions will be shared among the owner, the time charterer, the voyage charterer or the contracting shipper; data verification, the surrender of allowances, the pooling of compliance balances, fuel choice, delay and the consequences of non-compliance must be expressly regulated in the contract. Because the regulations change rapidly, the current scope and timetable are checked separately for each voyage and vessel.
In the European Union Emissions Trading System, the emissions year and the allowance surrender year are different: the surrender of allowances is envisaged in 2026 for 70% of the in-scope emissions reported for 2025, and from 2027 for 100% of the previous year’s in-scope emissions. In the 2026 emissions period, methane and nitrous oxide also fall within the scope. FuelEU Maritime, on the other hand, is a separate regulation on the greenhouse gas intensity of the energy used on board, applicable since January 1, 2025. The vessel, port, voyage and exceptions are checked separately for both systems.
Maritime Safety, Security and Regulatory Compliance
The effect of obligations under SOLAS, MARPOL, STCW, the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREG), ISM and ISPS on contracts, company procedures and incident management is assessed. Findings of the flag state, the port state and the classification society are addressed with respect to detention of the vessel, conditions of class, deficiencies, voyage safety and insurance.
Cyber incidents, electronic navigation and cargo systems, automatic identification system (AIS) and voyage data recorder (VDR) data, remote access, ransomware and business continuity risks are reviewed from the standpoint of data protection, notification, evidence and contractual liability.
SOLAS concerns the safety of life at sea; MARPOL the prevention of pollution from vessels; STCW the training, certification and watchkeeping standards of seafarers; ISM safety management; and ISPS the security of vessels and port facilities. A technical compliance certificate and an assessment of legal liability are not the same review.
Sanctions, Export Controls and Maritime Trade Compliance
The examination of the vessel, owner, operator, cargo, bank, insurer, route and port parties against sanctions and restriction lists; the contractual sanctions clause, payment blocks, deviation, termination and documentation obligations are addressed. Indicators such as a change of flag, an AIS gap, ship-to-ship transfers, cargo origin and the ownership chain are assessed on a risk basis.
Sanctions regimes vary by country and by transaction. The effect of a state’s sanctions in Turkish law must be reviewed separately on the basis of the law applicable to the contract, the payment system and the connection with the countries concerned.
Legal basis: 4, 5, 11, 14, 15, 16