The Building Registration Certificate (Yapı Kayıt Belgesi) is a special administrative document introduced by Provisional Article 16 of the Zoning Law No. 3194 (İmar Kanunu), known to the public as the “Zoning Amnesty” (İmar Barışı). It was designed to bring on record unlicensed buildings, or buildings contrary to their permit and its annexes, that meet certain conditions. The scheme operated on the basis of the building owner’s declaration during the application period; the issuance of a building registration certificate did not mean that the building had become fully compliant with zoning legislation, that it had obtained a construction permit or an occupancy permit, or that its technical safety had been approved by the administration.
As of 2026 there is no new general Zoning Amnesty application period. However, the validity and cancellation of certificates issued in the past, title deed and permit transactions made in reliance on those certificates, the sale of Treasury or municipal real property, demolition orders and administrative fines, the property rights of third parties and criminal investigations continue to make up a significant share of current disputes.
For this reason, in a dispute over a building registration certificate it is not enough to look only at the existence of the certificate. The following must be examined together: for which building, on the basis of which declaration, on which date and on what ownership footing the certificate was issued; whether the building existed before December 31, 2017; whether one of the areas for which no certificate can be issued is involved; any additional works carried out later; the administration’s ground for cancellation and whether that ground has been proved with concrete evidence.
1. What Is a Building Registration Certificate?
Provisional Article 16 of the Zoning Law No. 3194 introduced a special regime, in the context of preparing for disaster risks, to bring on record unlicensed buildings or buildings contrary to their permit and its annexes and to achieve a zoning amnesty. The regime took as its basis buildings constructed before December 31, 2017.
1.1. A Building Registration Certificate is not a construction permit
A Building Registration Certificate does not mean that:
- a new construction permit has been granted for the building,
- the building has obtained an occupancy permit (yapı kullanma izin belgesi),
- all zoning violations have been permanently eliminated,
- the building’s earthquake resistance has been approved by technical examination,
- private-law disputes concerning the real property have been resolved.
The basic function of the certificate is to produce certain legal consequences of a temporary nature within the limits drawn by the Law.
1.2. Period of validity of the certificate
Under the system of the Law, the building registration certificate remains valid until the building is rebuilt or an urban transformation (kentsel dönüşüm) project is implemented. If the building is renewed, the current zoning legislation applies. The Building Registration Certificate therefore does not create an acquired right to a permit for future reconstruction.
2. Can a New Zoning Amnesty Application Be Made in 2026?
No. The general application and payment periods provided in Provisional Article 16 have expired. The legal questions that continue today concern mainly the validity, cancellation and correction of certificates issued earlier, disputes over the fee, and the administrative or private-law consequences attached to the certificate.
This distinction matters: a statement such as “the Zoning Amnesty is an application programme still in force” is not current. On the other hand, Provisional Article 16 and the legal consequences of transactions carried out in the past in reliance on it remain relevant.
3. For Which Buildings Can a Building Registration Certificate Not Be Issued?
Under Provisional Article 16 of Law No. 3194 and the Procedures and Principles Concerning the Issuance of Building Registration Certificates (Yapı Kayıt Belgesi Verilmesine İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar), the following situations are particularly important:
3.1. Buildings constructed after December 31, 2017
The basic time condition for the certificate is that the building was constructed before December 31, 2017. Establishing in concrete terms that the whole building, or the violation covered by the certificate, arose after this date is among the most frequent disputes in cancellation cases.
3.2. Real property subject to private ownership of third parties
Buildings located on real property subject to the private ownership of third parties are outside the scope of the regime. This heading gives rise to serious disputes in particular with regard to:
- the rights of other co-owners in co-owned real property,
- the common areas of apartment buildings and housing estates,
- buildings erected on someone else’s parcel,
- a single person presenting himself or herself as the exclusive right holder in areas of common ownership.
3.3. Certain protected and excepted areas
The Law and secondary legislation contain special limitations concerning certain areas of the Bosphorus, areas designated in the historic peninsula of Istanbul, certain zones in the Gallipoli Historical Site, and certain Treasury real property allocated for social facilities.
In addition, if the building is located in an area subject to special protection legislation, it cannot be accepted that the provisions of special laws have been set aside merely because a Building Registration Certificate exists.
4. Why Is a Building Registration Certificate Cancelled?
4.1. The building or the violation was constructed after December 31, 2017
This is the principal ground for cancellation in practice. However, the administration’s abstract opinion that “it was constructed after 2017” should not be sufficient on its own. The construction date must be established on the basis of concrete, verifiable and mutually consistent evidence.
4.2. A certificate obtained for a property or area for which no certificate may be issued
This category includes third-party ownership, areas expressly excluded from scope by the legislation, and cases where, because of the nature of the building, issuing a certificate is not possible.
4.3. An erroneous declaration resulting in an insufficient fee
Where the building registration fee has been underpaid because the building or land area, the building class or information affecting the calculation of the fee was declared incompletely and contrary to the facts, the correction and additional payment mechanism in the legislation becomes important. Failure to remedy the deficiency within the period given may lead to cancellation of the certificate and, depending on the circumstances of the specific case, to assessment under criminal law.
4.4. Not every inaccuracy is a ground for cancellation
Not every material error in a Building Registration Certificate automatically renders the certificate void. In particular, errors that lead to an overpayment must be distinguished from false declarations that remove the essential conditions of the certificate.
5. How Is the Date of December 31, 2017 Proved?
Determining the date on which the building existed is the centre of the dispute in most files.
5.1. Satellite images and aerial photographs
Historical satellite images such as Google Earth, and official or technical aerial photographs, are strong evidentiary tools. However, the resolution of the images, the date they were taken, the nature of the building and its distinguishability in the image must be assessed separately.
5.2. On-site examination and expert examination
Where images alone are not sufficient, an on-site examination (keşif) and a technical expert examination may be required. The construction technique of the building, the age of its materials, the stages of construction and physical traces may be assessed together with other documents.
5.3. Supporting evidence
Depending on the specific file, the following documents may also be important:
- dated photographs and video recordings,
- stop-work records (yapı tatil tutanakları),
- electricity, water and similar subscription records,
- invoices and delivery notes,
- municipal house-numbering and archive records,
- dated lease or use documents,
- dated sale advertisements or appraisal records,
- witness statements.
Each of these may not produce a conclusive result on its own; what matters is that the evidence is assessed together and that the conclusion reached by the administration is capable of being reviewed.
6. Current Case Law: Determining the Construction Date with Concrete Evidence
6.1. Istanbul Regional Administrative Court, 5th Administrative Case Chamber, E.2019/2619, K.2020/94, January 21, 2020
The decision emphasised that where it cannot be clarified from the available documents whether the building was constructed before or after December 31, 2017, the 2017 and 2018 satellite images must be obtained, an on-site examination and expert examination must be carried out where necessary, and all documents and photographs must be assessed together.
6.2. Council of State Plenary Session of the Administrative Chambers (İDDK), E.2024/19, K.2024/40, October 2, 2024
The Plenary Session, assessing together the photographs uploaded to the system at the time of application and satellite images from different periods, found lawful the cancellation of the certificate issued for a building on which construction activity was established to have begun after December 31, 2017.
6.3. Council of State 4th Chamber, E.2025/992, K.2025/6848, December 22, 2025
The decision stated that certificates which the administration determines do not satisfy the conditions of the Law may be cancelled, and that buildings concretely proved to have been constructed after December 31, 2017 cannot benefit from the rights afforded by the Building Registration Certificate.
When these decisions are assessed together, the critical point is not merely that the certificate appears “active” in the system, but that the material facts on which the certificate rests are consistent with the statutory conditions.
7. Can an Action Be Brought Against the Cancellation of a Building Registration Certificate?
Yes. To the extent that the cancellation of a building registration certificate constitutes a final administrative act that must be executed, it may be made the subject of an annulment action before the administrative courts.
The purpose of the action is not merely to have the certificate become “active” again. Because the cancellation act can in many cases become the basis for other acts relating to demolition, fines, permits, subscriptions, title deeds or Treasury/municipal real property, bringing the principal act before judicial review within the time limit is of strategic importance.
8. Competent Court and Court with Territorial Jurisdiction
Since the act cancelling a Building Registration Certificate is an administrative act, the competent branch of the judiciary is the administrative judiciary. In determining the court with territorial jurisdiction in a specific case, the nature of the act and its connection with the real property must be assessed together.
In general, the dispute is heard before the administrative court with jurisdiction over the place where the real property is located; however, before filing the action, the jurisdiction provisions of Law No. 2577 must also be checked separately in respect of the specific act.
9. Time Limit for Filing Suit and Applications under Articles 10–11 of the İYUK
9.1. The general time limit against the cancellation act
Unless a special period is provided, the time limit for filing an annulment action before the administrative court is, as a rule, 60 days from the day following the proper notification of the administrative act.
9.2. Application to the superior authority under Article 11 of the İYUK
Before filing suit, the person concerned may apply, within the time limit for filing suit, to the superior authority, or, if there is none, to the authority that performed the act, for the act to be withdrawn, revoked or amended. This application suspends the time limit for filing suit that has begun to run.
Following the 2021 amendment, if no reply is given to this application within 30 days, the request is deemed rejected. The 60-day implied-rejection period seen in older sources is no longer current.
In the event of rejection or implied rejection, the suspended time limit for filing suit resumes from where it left off; the time elapsed up to the application is taken into account.
9.3. Request for a new act under Article 10 of the İYUK
In cases such as a third party requesting the cancellation of a building registration certificate that was not notified to him or her directly, a request that the administration perform an act under Article 10 of the İYUK may arise. Here too, an implied rejection arises if the administration remains silent for 30 days.
Because the calculation of the period may produce different results depending on the file, the date of notification, the date of learning, earlier applications and the replies given must each be examined separately.
10. Can a Stay of Execution Be Requested?
If, following the cancellation of the Building Registration Certificate, demolition, a fine, cancellation of a permit or other consequences that are difficult to reverse may arise, a request for a stay of execution in the annulment action should be assessed separately.
Under Article 27 of the İYUK, a stay of execution generally requires that the following conditions be met together:
- the administrative act is manifestly unlawful,
- implementation of the act would cause damage that is difficult or impossible to compensate.
For this reason, the mere fact that “an action has been filed” does not by itself stop the implementation of the act.
11. Do Demolition and Fines Become Automatic When the Building Registration Certificate Is Cancelled?
Cancellation of the certificate may cause the building to lose the protection arising from Provisional Article 16. Thereafter, the municipality or other competent administrations may take action within the scope of Articles 32 and 42 of Law No. 3194.
However, each act must be lawful in terms of its own elements. For example, the following must also be examined separately:
- whether the stop-work record was drawn up in accordance with procedure,
- whether the violation has been shown in a concrete and measurable manner,
- whether the building owner and the responsible persons have been correctly identified,
- whether the administrative fine has been calculated correctly,
- whether the demolition decision was taken by the competent authority.
11.1. Demolition and fines while the certificate is active
In its decision of June 24, 2025, E.2025/702, K.2025/3990, the 4th Chamber of the Council of State accepted that, as long as the building registration certificate in dispute has not been cancelled by the competent administration, the existence of the certificate is important for the enforceability of demolition and fine decisions.
For this reason, in practice, the administrative opinion that “the certificate is unlawful” is not the same as the situation in which “the certificate has been cancelled in due form.”
12. False Declaration and Article 206 of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK)
Because the Building Registration Certificate system is based on declaration, a finding that a knowingly false declaration was made in respect of a building for which no certificate can be issued may also bring criminal consequences into play.
Article 8 of the Procedures and Principles Concerning the Issuance of Building Registration Certificates provides that, where it is established that a certificate has been issued for a building for which none could be issued, the certificate is cancelled and a criminal complaint is filed under Article 206 of the TCK against the applicant who made the false declaration.
However, the cancellation of an administrative document does not by itself automatically prove criminal liability. In the criminal proceedings, the following must be assessed separately:
- whether the declaration was contrary to the facts,
- whether the applicant knew this,
- its effect on the issuance of the official document,
- the element of intent,
- the possibility of a technical or material error in the application.
13. The Offence of Causing Zoning Pollution and Article 184 of the TCK
The consequences of a Building Registration Certificate dispute under Article 184 of the TCK must be determined by examining together the nature of the building, its construction date, its location, its permit status, subsequent works and, where applicable, the scope of the building registration certificate.
In particular, where new unlicensed works have been carried out after the building registration certificate was obtained, the old and new works must necessarily be distinguished from one another.
The cancellation of a building registration certificate does not mean an automatic conviction under Article 184 of the TCK in every specific case. Criminal liability is assessed separately within the statutory elements of the offence.
14. Effect on the Business Opening and Operating Licence and Other Permits
There may be business opening and operating licences or other administrative permits that were issued on the basis of a Building Registration Certificate without requiring an occupancy permit.
Cancellation of the certificate may affect the legal basis of these permits. However, the following must also be examined separately:
- on the basis of which legislation the licence was issued,
- whether the Building Registration Certificate was the sole legal basis of the licence,
- subsequent legislation or licensing acts,
- whether there is a claim of acquired right.
For activities subject to tourism, health, education, fuel or other special legislation, the relevant special laws and regulations apply separately.
15. Status of Water, Electricity and Natural Gas Subscriptions
Provisional Article 16 provides that water, electricity and natural gas may be connected temporarily, under certain conditions, to buildings that hold a Building Registration Certificate.
Cancellation of the certificate may affect the basis of these subscriptions; however, whether a subscription ends directly and automatically must be assessed on the basis of the relevant service legislation and the specific act performed by the distribution company. For this reason, the absolute statement seen in older practice that “if the certificate is cancelled, all subscriptions are cancelled automatically” is not safe for every file.
16. Effect on the Sale of Treasury or Municipal Real Property
Provisional Article 16 contains provisions on the sale of certain Treasury or municipal real property to holders of building registration certificates.
Where the sale was carried out in reliance on the Building Registration Certificate, cancellation of the certificate may directly affect the legal position of the sale. Annotations in the title deed record, the sale contract, the relevant National Real Estate (Millî Emlak) regulations and the payment position must be examined together.
Under this heading, the following in particular may give rise to separate legal problems:
- whether the real property is of a nature that can be made the subject of a sale,
- whether the sale has been fully concluded,
- annotations or notes placed in the land registry,
- refund of the price,
- compensation for unjust occupation (ecrimisil) and the position of use.
17. Change of Category and Condominium Ownership
Where a change of category (cins değişikliği) or condominium ownership (kat mülkiyeti) has been established in reliance on a Building Registration Certificate, the consequences if the certificate is later cancelled are assessed separately in terms of the land registry.
A simple conclusion that the cancellation of the Building Registration Certificate will in every case automatically remove an earlier land registry transaction should not be drawn. Land Registry and Cadastre practice, annotations to be made in the registry, the protection of ownership and the acquisitions of third parties must be examined according to the specific case.
18. Refund of the Building Registration Fee: The Importance of the 2024 Council of State Decision
For a long time, Article 8/2 of the Procedures and Principles Concerning the Issuance of Building Registration Certificates contained a provision that, if a certificate had been issued for a building for which none could be issued and was later cancelled, “the amount paid as the Building Registration Certificate fee shall not be refunded.”
By its decision of March 5, 2024, E.2021/10380, K.2024/1538, the 6th Chamber of the Council of State annulled this wording.
For this reason, in assessing a refund of the fee in 2026, it is not correct to rely on the approach found in older texts that “the fee for a cancelled certificate is not refunded in any circumstances.” The existence and scope of a right to a refund must be assessed together on the basis of the ground for cancellation, the applicant’s conduct, the administration’s act and current case law.
Moreover, an overpayment is different from the cancellation of the certificate. The legislation separately regulates the refund of the overpaid portion by a specific procedure.
19. The Constitutional Court’s 2024 Decision on Earthquake Responsibility
By its decision of July 23, 2024, E.2023/74, K.2024/141, the Constitutional Court (Anayasa Mahkemesi) annulled the sentence in the tenth paragraph of Provisional Article 16 of Law No. 3194 reading “The earthquake resistance of the building is the responsibility of the owner.”
The basic approach of the decision is that the issuance of a building registration certificate on the basis of a declaration does not wholly remove the administration’s constitutional positive obligations in the field of the right to life and supervision.
19.1. Practical importance of the decision
This decision:
- does not change the fact that the Building Registration Certificate is not a technical safety document.
- does not mean that owners have no obligations regarding building safety.
- but prevents the State from being wholly relieved by law of its duty of supervision and oversight.
- keeps open the possibility that the administration’s liability for possible damage may be argued under the circumstances of the specific case.
Accordingly, in a current legal assessment, the older statement that “earthquake resistance is entirely the owner’s responsibility and the administration can bear no responsibility whatsoever” should not be used.
20. Property Rights of Third Parties: How Can a Certificate Be Cancelled?
A Building Registration Certificate may have been obtained on the declaration of a person other than the true owner of the real property. Third-party property rights may be directly affected in particular in disputes over common areas, co-owned real property or someone else’s parcel.
20.1. Application to the administration
A third party to whom the certificate was not notified may, depending on the nature of the specific case, request under Article 10 of the İYUK that the competent administration perform an act cancelling the certificate.
The following may be attached to the application:
- the current title deed record,
- the management plan,
- condominium ownership (kat mülkiyeti) or floor servitude (kat irtifakı) documents,
- the project showing the common area,
- photographs and measurements,
- accessible records concerning the building registration application,
- the relevant municipal documents.
20.2. The 30-day implied-rejection period
If the administration does not reply within 30 days, an implied rejection may arise under Article 10 of the İYUK. The time limit for filing suit should be calculated accordingly.
20.3. The current approach of the Council of State
In its decision of January 20, 2025, E.2024/572, K.2025/59, the Council of State Plenary Session of the Administrative Chambers (İDDK) emphasised that a Building Registration Certificate cannot be issued for buildings on real property owned by third parties, and that a certificate not consistent with material reality cannot benefit from legal consequences.
In its decision of December 9, 2025, E.2025/689, K.2025/6700, the 6th Chamber of the Council of State also stated that a certificate issued where the condition of not being located on real property subject to the private ownership of third parties is not satisfied will not confer rights on the persons concerned.
21. Common Areas of Apartment Buildings and Housing Estates
With regard to common areas, the Building Registration Certificate does not eliminate ownership relations arising from the Condominium Law.
For example, where a condominium unit owner:
- encloses the common terrace,
- builds on the garden area,
- uses the common corridor or roof area as if it were an independent area,
- claims an exclusive right in the social facility of a housing estate,
and obtains a Building Registration Certificate for that area, this does not by itself eliminate the private-law rights of the other owners.
The Building Registration Certificate must be distinguished from the permissions, consents and common-ownership rules arising from condominium law.
22. Building Registration Certificate in Co-Owned Real Property
In co-ownership in shares (paylı mülkiyet), one co-owner obtaining a certificate does not end the other co-owners’ right of ownership in the land.
In a dispute the following matters should be investigated:
- by whom the building was constructed,
- which part it covers,
- whether there is a de facto partition among the co-owners,
- how the ownership position was declared in the application,
- the consent or objection of the other co-owners,
- how the certificate was used in the title deed or another administrative act.
A certificate-cancellation dispute in the administrative judiciary is different from actions that may be heard in the judicial courts, such as prevention of interference, compensation for unjust occupation (ecrimisil), dissolution of co-ownership (ortaklığın giderilmesi) or actions arising from the Condominium Law.
23. What Should Be Done Immediately When a Certificate Is Cancelled?
23.1. Preserve the notification document and its date
For the time limit for filing suit, the date of notification of the act is critical. If there is electronic notification, the system records should also be kept.
23.2. Identify exactly the ground for cancellation
On what ground has the administration relied?
- construction after 2017?
- third-party ownership?
- a protected area?
- insufficient payment?
- the wrong building class or area?
- additional works carried out later?
A defence strategy cannot be built without identifying the ground.
23.3. Collect evidence on the construction date before it disappears
Historical satellite images, municipal archives, photographs and invoices are evidence that may become harder to access over time.
23.4. Check related acts separately
If, apart from the cancellation of the certificate, there is:
- demolition,
- a fine,
- sealing,
- cancellation of a permit,
- an annotation in the title deed,
- a subscription act,
- a sale transaction,
- a criminal investigation,
the date of notification and the route of action or objection for each must be tracked separately.
24. Strategic Checklist in Building Registration Certificate Cases
24.1. Administrative file
- Building Registration Certificate and application form
- photographs uploaded during the application
- payment receipts
- cancellation review record
- satellite or aerial images
- municipal correspondence
- notification or complaint documents
- approval of the Governorate/Provincial Directorate (Valilik/İl Müdürlüğü oluru)
24.2. Real property file
- title deed records
- survey sketch and staking-out (çap ve aplikasyon)
- zoning status
- permit and projects
- occupancy permit
- condominium ownership documents
- management plan
- common area projects
24.3. Proof of date
- photograph/video
- invoices
- stop-work records
- subscription records
- satellite images
- on-site examination and expert
24.4. Procedure
- date of notification
- application under Article 10 or 11 of the İYUK
- calculation of the 30-day implied rejection
- remaining time limit for filing suit
- whether a stay of execution is needed
25. Frequently Asked Questions
Is a building with a Building Registration Certificate entirely lawful?
No. A Building Registration Certificate does not have the same legal nature as a construction permit or an occupancy permit and does not show that the building complies with all zoning legislation.
Can a new Building Registration Certificate be obtained in 2026?
The general Zoning Amnesty application period has ended. Current disputes concern the legal consequences of certificates obtained in the past.
Within how many days must an action be brought against the cancellation of a Building Registration Certificate?
Unless there is a special period, an annulment action must generally be filed within 60 days from the day following notification of the act. If an application under Article 11 of the İYUK has been made, the calculation of the period changes.
Is the administration’s reply/implied-rejection period 60 days under Articles 10 and 11 of the İYUK?
No. After the 2021 amendment, the implied-rejection period under the relevant provisions is 30 days.
How is it proved that a building was constructed before December 31, 2017?
Satellite images, aerial photographs, municipal records, stop-work records, dated photographs, invoices and, where necessary, an on-site and expert examination may be assessed together.
If a Building Registration Certificate is cancelled, is the fee paid certainly lost?
Older sources should be treated with caution on this point. By the decision of the 6th Chamber of the Council of State dated March 5, 2024, E.2021/10380, K.2024/1538, the wording “the fee shall not be refunded” in the Communiqué was annulled. The specific case must be assessed separately.
If the certificate is cancelled, is the building demolished immediately?
After cancellation of the certificate, a demolition process may arise under zoning legislation; however, the demolition act must separately be performed by the competent administration in accordance with the procedure in the law, and that act is also subject to judicial review.
Can the municipality disregard the certificate without cancelling the Building Registration Certificate?
Where the certificate retains its legal existence, it is not possible in every specific case to accept that it will produce no consequences merely because the administration “considers it invalid.” Current Council of State case law attaches importance to whether the certificate has been cancelled by the competent administration.
Does a Building Registration Certificate obtained on someone else’s land confer rights?
Buildings on real property subject to the private ownership of third parties are outside the scope of the regime. Current Council of State decisions also emphasise that such certificates, which do not meet the conditions, will not confer rights.
Is a Building Registration Certificate an earthquake safety document?
No. In addition, by its decision of July 23, 2024, the Constitutional Court annulled the statutory sentence “the earthquake resistance of the building is the responsibility of the owner.” This decision showed that the administration’s constitutional obligations of supervision and oversight cannot be wholly removed by law.
26. Conclusion
Building Registration Certificate disputes are no longer merely a matter of a “Zoning Amnesty application” of the 2018 period. As of 2026, the disputes centre on cancellation of the certificate, proof of the construction date, third-party ownership, demolition and fines, refund of the fee, land registry transactions, administrative permits, criminal-law consequences under Articles 206 and 184 of the TCK, and the administration’s responsibility in the field of building safety.
The most critical approach in these files is not to treat the Building Registration Certificate in isolation, but to examine together the application file, the real property records, the zoning archive, historical images, related administrative acts and the time limits for filing suit.
In particular, where cancellation of the certificate has been notified, the general 60-day time limit for filing suit and the 30-day administrative reply/implied-rejection periods under Articles 10–11 of the İYUK must not be confused with one another.
Legal Bases and Selected Current Decisions
- Zoning Law No. 3194, Provisional Article 16
- Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 (İYUK), Articles 7, 10, 11 and 27
- Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, Articles 184 and 206
- Procedures and Principles Concerning the Issuance of Building Registration Certificates (Yapı Kayıt Belgesi Verilmesine İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar)
- Constitutional Court (AYM), E.2023/74, K.2024/141, July 23, 2024
- Council of State 6th Chamber, E.2021/10380, K.2024/1538, March 5, 2024
- Council of State Plenary Session of the Administrative Chambers (İDDK), E.2024/19, K.2024/40, October 2, 2024
- Council of State İDDK, E.2024/572, K.2025/59, January 20, 2025
- Council of State 4th Chamber, E.2025/702, K.2025/3990, June 24, 2025
- Council of State 6th Chamber, E.2025/689, K.2025/6700, December 9, 2025
- Council of State 4th Chamber, E.2025/992, K.2025/6848, December 22, 2025
- Istanbul Regional Administrative Court, 5th Administrative Case Chamber, E.2019/2619, K.2020/94, January 21, 2020